Skip to main content

Solana

Let's start with a quick overview of Solana, and then we will continue with comparing Solana to Chromia and also discuss the benefits and challenges with the two solutions.

Solana​

Tech and architecture

  • Solana uses a single-layer blockchain architecture, meaning all transactions are processed on the main chain. This contrasts with multi-layer architectures, such as Chromia or Polkadot, which use subchains to process transactions in parallel.
  • Solana's consensus mechanism is called Proof of History (PoH), a unique way to timestamp transactions and achieve consensus. It creates a verifiable record of the passage of time, which allows nodes to reach a consensus on the order of transactions quickly. PoH is combined with Proof of Stake (PoS) to secure the network and incentivize participating nodes.

Scalability

  • There are multiple factors combined that allow Solana to scale effectively. PoH consensus model is, of course one, making it quick for nodes to reach consensus, and combined with:

    • Gulf Stream protocol, which anticipates validator actions, thus speeding up the process.
    • Sealevel, a parallel execution environment for smart contracts, allowing thousands of contracts to run simultaneously.

  • These innovations collectively enable Solana to handle a large volume of transactions swiftly and securely.

Development tools

  • Solana developers use programming languages like Rust and C/C++ to build decentralized applications (dapps) on the Solana blockchain.
  • Rust is a popular choice because it is a safe and fast language.
  • Solana offers a number of other tools and libraries for developers, such as the Solana CLI, Solana Anchor, and Solana Program Library.

Fee structure

  • Solana uses a fixed fee model, which means that the cost of transactions is relatively low and predictable. This model is designed to make it cost-effective for developers and users to interact with the network.

Comparison​

Development​

Solana

  • Rust is the most popular programming language for Solana development, but C/C++ can also be used. Rust is favored for its safety features and performance, which make it a good choice for developing dapps and smart contracts on Solana.
  • There are a couple of tools and frameworks to help build on Solana. For example, Solana Anchor and SPL these are libraries and frameworks with functionality to handle token transfers, account management, etc. There are also tools for building and deploying Solana programs.

Chromia

  • Chromia uses Rell, a relational blockchain programming language. Rell can be a more user-friendly language than Go or Rust, making it easier for developers to build dapps on Chromia.
  • Development on Chromia using Rell is very similar to Web2 development. For more insights on this, check out our guide here.
  • Chromia provides tools and libraries to simplify authentication, transaction signing, and asset management, and new features are added to support rapid dapp development.
  • Chromia's development environment has support for testing using its own test framework and simple deployment using developer-friendly tools.

Scalability​

Solana

  • Solana's key to high transaction speed is its Proof of History (PoH) consensus mechanism, which effectively timestamps transactions, allowing for rapid validation. Combined with Tower BFT, a version of Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Solana achieves both speed and security.

  • Solana's architecture consists of several features to optimize scalability:

Sealevel, a parallel smart contracts runtime, enables the simultaneous processing of transactions.

Gulf Stream, a protocol that allows for transactions to be sent directly to validators before the current block is even completed, reducing confirmation times and network congestion.

Solana has an advanced architecture with many components. You can read more here.

Chromia

  • Chromia's approach is that every dapp on Chromia operates on a unique subchain. Each subchain can handle hundreds of transactions every second. If a dapp witnesses growth, it can with ease be expanded by adding more chains. This structure guarantees sustained high throughput and a predictable way of scaling your dapp, much like in a traditional cloud environment.

    Since every subchain is isolated from other subchains, this means that they can process transactions in parallel, in essence scaling horizontally and only your app architecture sets the limit for scalability.

    Chromias sidechain architecture is built into the platform, making it a low effort for developers to utilize this approach of side chains.

Operational Costs & Fees​

Solana

Solana uses traditional transaction fees, meaning that each transaction sent through the network is associated with a fee.

Fees are calculated from these parts:

  • Base fee is the minimum fee charged for a transaction on the Solana network. This fee is determined by the current demand for block space and the network's congestion level.
  • Computational Fee is measured by the computational resources required for a transaction in "compute units." Transactions that demand more computational power (like those involving complex smart contract operations) will cost more.

Chromia

  • Chromia changes the game by allowing developers to host their decentralized app (dapp) in a container for a fixed, predictable fee. This transparency means developers know how much their operational costs are each month, and they can create their own end-user fee structures to cover these operational expenses.

    So, instead of being charged gas fees for every action, there's a single, more manageable cost to work with.

  • As a Chromia dapp grows in usage, the developer of the sapp can increase the resources of their container. Very similar to how you manage resources in a Cloud environment.

Revenue models​

Solana

  • As with other blockchains, Solana generates transaction fees when users execute transactions on the network. The dapp developer can also add an extra fee per transaction as a source of revenue.
  • Since Solana has a generally low transaction fee, it opens up to more freedom in choosing your revenue model as a dapp developer.

Chromia

  • Operational costs of dapps are fixed and predictable on Chromia. The dapp developer can choose which fee model they want to use for their end-users. With Chromia, you are not locked in by transaction and gas fees.

  • For your dapp, you can have a monthly subscription fee, charge for single features, or, if you want, per transaction. This opens up a more user-friendly experience since you can even let the user start for free and then open up for revenues later when the user has found the value of your dapp. This is a common practice in traditional web applications and should be no different for Web3.

Conclusion and comparison summary to Chromia​

Solana and Chromia are both well-architectured to handle common issues with traditional blockchain platforms. Let's summarize and discuss the benefits and challenges.

Architecture​

Solana features a solid design with its PoH consensus model and protocols built for fast transaction throughput. This architecture also opens for low transaction fees, but questions have been raised about Solana being too centralized. This comes from Solana having much fewer nodes than Ethereum or Bitcoin. The reason for this is that Solana’s high transaction volume necessitates significant hardware needs for validators.

In contrast, Chromia stands out for its simplicity, accessibility, and decentralization. Chromia's consensus mechanism uses Proof of Authority, and becoming a Provider doesn't have the high hardware requirements of Solana makes the number of providers higher on Chromia and then more decentralized.

Chromia uses Rell, a relational blockchain programming language, deliberately similar to modern programming languages like JavaScript and Kotlin. This makes it a comfortable platform for developers, especially those transitioning from traditional web development.

This allows for a broader range of developers to create dapps without the steep learning curve associated with more complex languages like Rust, used in Solana.

Scalability Considerations​

While Solanas's scalability is achieved through Proof of History (PoH) consensus mechanisms and technologies like Gulf Stream and Sealevel, there have been concerns that it comes at the cost of reduced security. The network's unique consensus mechanism, Proof of History, is still relatively untested compared to more established mechanisms like Proof of Authority or Proof of Stake. Solana's architecture and technologies can be complex and difficult for new developers to understand and work with, potentially limiting developer adoption.

Chromia, on the other hand, offers a straightforward scalability solution. Each dapp operates on its own subchain, capable of handling high transaction volumes. Scalability can be easily managed through resource adjustments, which is very close to cloud services. Making the development and resource management effort more straightforward. The ability to add subchains enables parallel execution of transactions, which gives the developer full control of scaling.

Operational costs & fees​

Solanas's dynamic fee model, though innovative, might pose unpredictability in costs for developers and end-users. Since every transaction sent through the network comes with a fee, although low for Solana, it still limits the way dapp developers can set their revenue models and user experience.

Chromia, however, offers a fixed, predictable fee for hosting dapps. This model not only simplifies budgeting for developers but also allows them to craft unique fee structures for end users, enhancing the user experience.

Revenue models​

Solana's revenue generation relies on traditional methods like staking and transaction fees. These mechanisms, while proven, may not offer the flexibility modern dapp developers seek.

Chromia allows developers to choose their revenue models, from subscriptions to feature-based charges or even transaction fees. This flexibility opens up creative revenue strategies that are more aligned with today's web apps.

Final words​

In summary, while Solana presents a powerful blockchain solution with a very high transaction speed and optimized scalability, Chromia stands out with its user- and developer-friendly approach, straightforward scalability, and innovative cost and revenue models. These features make Chromia an appealing choice, especially for those seeking a seamless transition from web2 into the web3 domain.